Thursday, November 6, 2008
I think it's important to point out that I did not choose to be a conservative. God made me this way. It is unfair for others to ask me to expand my thinking and accept homosexual lifestyles, because it would deny who I really am. It's difficult to be a conservative in this liberal world. We are constantly the butt of jokes and the objects of scorn. But, today I am proud to be a conservative. I am glad God made me this way, even if it does make things difficult for me sometimes. We are all different and you need to be tolerant of me and accept my lifestyle and ideas. To do otherwise, would make you hateful, divisive, and oppressive.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Since World War II, we have never been asked to sacrifice anything to help our country, except the blood of our heroic men and women. As president, what sacrifices -- sacrifices will you ask every American to make to help restore the American dream and to get out of the economic morass that we're now in?
“Well, Fiorra, I'm going to ask the American people to understand that there are some programs that we may have to eliminate.”
So, he is going to ask us to understand stuff. Is that one of the sacrifices? I don’t know, John; that is a lot you’re asking of me. I simply don’t want to understand stuff. I have a Constitutional right to not understand or to not even attempt to understand. That’s a tough one.
“I first proposed a long time ago that we would have to examine every agency and every bureaucracy of government. And we're going to have to eliminate those that aren't working.”
Sacrifice #2 is that we the American people will have to do without government agencies and bureaucracies that aren’t working. Hmm. That also won’t be easy. We have all grown accustomed to our useless agencies and bureaucracies. Is it really a “sacrifice” to give up something that isn’t working? Many people don’t even know we have certain agencies. Is it a “sacrifice” to give up something we don’t know we have especially when it isn’t doing anything to help us?
“I know a lot of them that aren't working. One of them is in defense spending, because I've taken on some of the defense contractors. I saved the taxpayers $6.8 billion in a deal for an Air Force tanker that was done in a corrupt fashion.”
So, we are going to have to sacrifice $6.8 billion on deals that you already saved us because you took them on? Is it really a sacrifice for the American people to give up deals that are done in a corrupt fashion? It is hard to see the sacrifice here. Are you just blowing your trumpet here? Is this just a chance for you to brag about something you did because it doesn’t really seem to fit with the question.
“I believe that we have to eliminate the earmarks. And sometimes those projects, not -- not the overhead projector that Sen. Obama asked for, but some of them that are really good projects, will have -- will have to be eliminated, as well.”
Okay, at least you have mentioned something specifically. Great job. But, again, I don’t know that anyone in the American public sees earmarks as a positive thing. I’m quite certain that most citizens are against them. Therefore, they will gladly give them up without any argument. So, they will be voluntarily and happily doing away with them; not sacrificing.
“And they'll have to undergo the same scrutiny that all projects should in competition with others.
So we're going to have to tell the American people that spending is going to have to be cut in America. And I recommend a spending freeze that -- except for defense, Veterans Affairs, and some other vital programs, we'll just have to have across-the-board freeze.”
This is better. Much better. Cutting spending on certain programs may force some Americans to make sacrifices. However, many Americans want to see lower spending by the government and if not lower spending, then smarter spending. So, at least something good will come of it. In addition, non-vital programs are just that – not vital. One would ask if a program is not vital, should it be a program at all? Therefore, freezing spending on that program will be viewed as a triumph.
“And some of those programs may not grow as much as we would like for them to, but we can establish priorities with full transparency, with full knowledge of the American people, and full consultation, not done behind closed doors and shoving earmarks in the middle of the night into programs that we don't even -- sometimes we don't even know about until months later.”
Again, we will be sacrificing things (earmarks) that we don’t want in the first place. No big deal.
“And, by the way, I want to go back a second.
Look, we can attack health care and energy at the same time. We're not -- we're not -- we're not rifle shots here. We are Americans. We can, with the participation of all Americans, work together and solve these problems together.
Frankly, I'm not going to tell that person without health insurance that, "I'm sorry, you'll have to wait." I'm going to tell you Americans we'll get to work right away and we'll get to work together, and we can get them all done, because that's what America has been doing.”Thanks for including another answer to the previous question which you didn’t answer that time and you’re still not answering now. It is extremely helpful. How do you propose we all work together on this? Should we get a huge conference room and talk it out? The truth is, Americans aren’t going to work together on this. The politicians are going to work together, or at least democrats and democrats and republicans and republicans will work together. Also, are you implying that Canadians are rifle shots? Or that other countries couldn’t do this at the same time? Are we somehow better than others?